Cases 41 - 50 of 278
WARREN v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02093
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHLOE WARGNY, CHRISTINA CONYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUKES v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02077
Plaintiff:
ISSAC JACIEL LUKES and ISAAC JACIEL LUKES
Defendant:
CHRISTINA REAGLE, DENNIS REAGLE, L. HAMBIEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARMSTEAD v. BROWN et al
as 1:2023cv02079
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. ARMSTEAD
Defendant:
BROWN, SUMMERS, SOLOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOYD
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, JACK SURGUY and A. ADEFILA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARSON v. REAGLE
as 1:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
QUEJUAN B.D. CARSON
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. CHAMBERS et al
as 1:2023cv01964
Plaintiff:
LARRY WARREN
Defendant:
LONI YOLANDA CHAMBERS, DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOVER v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
JUDSON HOOVER
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, KYLE MCKINNEY and CASSIDY VANDINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. HOLCOMB et al
as 1:2023cv01938
Plaintiff:
BURL JOHNSON, MARQUES LOVE and TONY PERRY
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. VARTER, DAUSS and others
Not Classified By Court:
GREGORY L. LAKER, CONNER DICKERSON and MARK SNIDERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2023cv01925
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MOTON
Defendant:
MCCAFFERTY, SHAVER, LAWSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justin Brabson v. Dennis Reagle
as 23-2984
Petitioner / Appellant:
JUSTIN BRABSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DENNIS REAGLE, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
