Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Robbins v. IMP Metro West, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tiffany C Robbins and Tiffany C Robins
Defendant:
IMP Metro West, LLC, Voyager Indemnity Insurance Co., Assurant Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Sana Healthcare Carrollton, LLC v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00738
Plaintiff:
Sana Healthcare Carrollton, LLC doing business as Carrollton Regional Medical Center
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sana Healthcare Carrollton, LLC d/b/a Carrollton Regional Medical Center v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00400
Plaintiff:
Sana Healthcare Carrollton, LLC d/b/a Carrollton Regional Medical Center
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Blanchard v. Department of Health and Human Services
as 6:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Christian Blanchard
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
State of Texas et al v. Brooks-LaSure et al
as 6:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and Texas Health and Human Services Commission
Defendant:
Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC dba UT Health Tyler et al v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC dba UT Health Tyler and East Texas Health System, LLC
Defendant:
Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC, Dr. Adam Corley and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Labor and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Society of Anesthesiologists, American College of Radiology, American College of Emergency Physicians and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., AIR METHODS CORPORATION, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Vapor Train 2 LLC et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 6:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Vapor Train 2 LLC and Magellan Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
