Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Jessica Smith, Joel Wallskog, M.D., Theodore Cabaniss, on behalf of his minor son, T.C. and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States Health Resources and Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A. et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 2:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Texas, P.A., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Florida, Inc., U.S. Anesthesia Partners of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Humana Inc. et al v. Becerra et al
as 4:2023cv00909
Plaintiff:
Humana Inc. and Humana Benefit Plan of Texas, Inc.
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 2:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Freedom Coalition of Doctors for Choice
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Wages & White Lion Investments LLC v. Califf et al
as 3:2023cv01269
Plaintiff:
Wages & White Lion Investments, LLC doing business as Triton Distribution and Wages & White Lion Investments LLC doing business as Triton Distribution
Defendant:
Robert M. Califf, M.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Xavier Becerra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
America First Policy Institute v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
as 4:2023cv00369
Plaintiff:
America First Policy Institute
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Texas et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 4:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
State of Texas and State of Oklahoma
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Secretary Xavier Becerra, Marvin Figueroa and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Emanuel McCray
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., Janet Woodcock, M.D. and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Danco Laboratories, LLC and Danco Laboratories LLC
Amicus Curiae:
The Chattanooga National Memorial for the Unborn, Doctors for America, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Family Research Council Action, Inc. et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Family Research Council Action, Inc., Matthew Krause, Donna Bramson and others
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, U.S. Department of Transportation, Peter Paul Montgomer Buttigieg and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
