Cases 31 - 40 of 135
Apter et al v. Department Of Health And Human Services et al
as 3:2022cv00184
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul E. Marik
Defendant:
Department Of Health And Human Services, Xavier Becerra, Food and Drug Administration and others
Amicus Curiae:
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons and America's Frontline Doctors
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
FILING ERROR
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra and United States Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Texas Medical Association et al. v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al.
as 6:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association, Tyler Regional Hospital, LLC and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
US Department of Health and Human Services,, Department of Labor, Department of the Treasury and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Office of Personnel Management, Kiran Ahuja, Janet Yellen and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., Air Methods Corporation, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Amicus Curiae:
Emergency Department Practice Management Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00453
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc., AIR METHODS CORPORATION, Rocky Mountain Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Informed Consent Action Network v. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2022cv01130
Plaintiff:
Informed Consent Action Network
Defendant:
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Texas v. Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
State of Texas
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Vapor Train 2 LLC et al v. U.S. Food and Drug Administration et al
as 6:2022cv00429
Plaintiff:
Vapor Train 2 LLC and Magellan Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, M.D., U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Texas Medical Association et al v. United States Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Texas Medical Association and Dr. Adam Corley
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Labor, United States Department of Treasury and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians Advocacy Institute, California Medical Association, Connecticut State Medical Society and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lifenet, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 6:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Lifenet, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Xavier Becerra, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Texas v. Becerra et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
State of Texas, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists and Christian Medical & Dental Associations
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York State, California State of, Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
