Cases 31 - 40 of 49
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv00904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02858
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv03593
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rodman v. Maryland Department of Human Resources et al
as 1:2012cv03218
Plaintiff:
Dione Rodman
Defendant:
Maryland Department of Human Resources, Baltimore City Department of Social Services, Sylvia Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sewell v. Prince George's County Department of Social Services
as 8:2012cv02522
Plaintiff:
Starsha Sewell
Defendant:
Prince George's County Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sewell v. PG County Department of Social Services
as 8:2012cv02402
Plaintiff:
Starsha Sewell
Defendant:
PG County Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chapman v. Baltimore City Department of Social Service
as 1:2012cv02077
Plaintiff:
Ramon C. Chapman
Defendant:
Baltimore City Department of Social Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohens v. State of Maryland Department of Human Resources et al
as 1:2011cv03419
Plaintiff:
Cheryl F. Cohens
Defendant:
State of Maryland Department of Human Resources and Baltimore City Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Akers v. Anne Arundel County Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2011cv02490
Plaintiff:
Laura Akers
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County Department of Social Services, Noreen Startt and David Ladd
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
