Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 41 - 49 of 49
RARITAN BAYKEEPER, INC. et al v. NL INDUSTRIES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv04117
Plaintiff: RARITAN BAYKEEPER, INC. and EDISON WETLANDS ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant: NL INDUSTRIES, INC., NL MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., SAYREVILLE ECONOMIC AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901 Environmental Cleanup Expenses
BARKOFF v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv00719
Plaintiff: KAREN A. BARKOFF
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
FLETCHER v. CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv00735
Petitioner: JANET FLETCHER
Defendant: CESSNA AIRCRAFT COMPANY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00424
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CITIZENS FOR RATIONAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 3:2007cv04551
Plaintiff: CITIZENS FOR RATIONAL COASTAL DEVELOPMENT
Defendant: UNITED STATES FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
STONEHILL v. HAWLEY et al
as 3:2007cv01815
Plaintiff: ROBERTA L. STONEHILL
Defendant: KIP HAWLEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VASQUEZ v. RUTHERFORD et al
as 3:2007cv01350
Plaintiff: ELIEL VASQUEZ
Defendant: JASON RUTHERFORD, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Cross Claimant: JASON RUTHERFORD, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and others
Cross Defendant: STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, CITY OF LAMBERTVILLE, NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
AMIRIANTZ, et al v. CRAWFORD, et al
as 1:2000cv00494
Plaintiff: V. GEORGE AMIRIANTZ
Defendant: JAMES A. CRAWFORD, JAMES W. WEINSTEIN, STEVE A. WYNN and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMEN, et al v. AMERICAN THERMOPLAST, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1998cv04781
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and KASPER DISPOSAL SERVICE
Defendant: AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORP. , CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, INC. , CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Counter_claimant: COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION , COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF CONNECTICUT, INC. , OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY , MENNEN COMPANY , WARNER LAMBERT COMPANY, INC. and others
Third_party_plaintiff: AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORP. , CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, INC. , CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Third_party_defendant: AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC. , ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. , BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC. and others
Plaintiff_consolidated: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant_consolidated: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY , DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter_claimant_consolidated: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM, INC. and FALCON MANUFACTURING , INC.
Movant: COOPERATIVE DISPOSAL CO. and M & H SERVICES
Fourthparty_plaintiff: HOECHST CELANESE CORP.
Fourthparty_defendant: STATEWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Third_party_plaintiff_consolidated: COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY and EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Third_party_defendant_consolidated: ELASTIMOLD CORPORATION , NATIONAL STARCH & CO and THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?