Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02972
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Department of Transportation et al
as 0:2023cv02559
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Department of Transportation and Civil Rights CDOT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00745
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Walz et al
as 0:2019cv02612
Defendant:
Bill Pal-Freeman, Michelle Smith, Eddie Miles and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. Minnesota Department of Transportation et al
as 0:2018cv00909
Plaintiff:
Glenn Nelson and Nelson Excavating
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Transportation, Houston Engineering Inc., Kern & Tabery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv00650
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv03583
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Transportation et al
as 0:2013cv00923
Plaintiff:
C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Transportation and Charles Zelle
Intervenor_defendant:
Ames/Lunda Joint Venture
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv00158
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
