Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeVinche Albritton v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6674
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
DeVinche Albritton v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6464
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
DeVinche Albritton v. Harold Clarke
as 19-6350
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Albritton v. Carpenter et al
as 2:2018cv00689
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Albritton
Defendant:
Lt. Liptrot, Officer Liggins, Wanda Rollins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVinche Albritton v. Edward Wright
as 15-8041
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDWARD WRIGHT, Warden of Lawrenceville Correctional Center, MR. MORGAN, Former Unit Manager of 30 building, MS. BACON, Former counselor of 30 building and others
Albritton v. The Virginian Pilot Newspaper et al
as 2:2012cv00347
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Albritton
Defendant:
The Virginian Pilot Newspaper, John or Jane Doe and Elizabeth Hulette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeVinche Albritton v. Gene Johnson
as 10-6912
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN DOE, Virginia Department of Corrections Health Services Director, DAVID B. EVERETT, Warden of Sussex II State Prison and others
DeVinche Albritton v. Gene Johnson
as 09-6736
Petitioner - Appellant:
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON
Respondent - Appellee:
GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
