Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Dexter Lewis v. Fayette Co. District Attorney, et al
as 17-12623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEXTER G. LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
FAYETTE COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FAYETTE COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Lewis v. Fayette County District Attorney Office et al
as 3:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dexter G. Lewis
Defendant:
Fayette County District Attorney Office, Georgia Department of Corrections and Fayette County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 1:2017cv00051
Plaintiff:
DEXTER G LEWIS
Defendant:
DOUGHERTY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Lewis v. Sams et al
as 3:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Dexter G. Lewis
Defendant:
Fletcher Sams, Warren Sellers, Matthew J. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Sams et al
as 1:2015cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dexter G. Lewis
Defendant:
Fletcher Sams and Warren Sellers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. MARSHALL et al
as 1:2015cv00005
Plaintiff:
DEXTER G LEWIS
Defendant:
DENISE MARSHALL, GREGORY EDWARDS and DOUGHERTY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Goodfriend et al
as 3:2010cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dexter G. Lewis
Defendant:
Pamela Goodfriend, Joseph Myers and Wayne Hannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2009cv02568
Plaintiff:
Dexter G. Lewis
Defendant:
Shawn Buchanan, East Point Police Department and Fulton County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Lewis v. Jackson et al
as 1:2009cv02454
Plaintiff:
Dexter G. Lewis
Defendant:
Ted Jackson, Fulton County Jail and Trinity Food Service Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
