Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Participant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mateo v. United States of America
as 1:2026cv00782
Petitioner:
Diego Mateo
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv03223
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Santos-Cano, et al. v. Bondi
as 25-4470
Petitioner:
CANO SANTOS-CANO, EULALIA DIEGO-MATEO and M. B. S.-D.
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Velez (Nelson)
as 24-1468
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER NELSON, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Velez (Garcia)
as 24-923
Defendant:
JONATHAN GARCIA, CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Velez (Woods)
as 23-6254
Defendant:
CARMELO VELEZ, CHRISTOPHER RODRIGUEZ, LUIS SEPULVEDA and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK WOODS
United States of America v. Velez (Ricardo Ricuarte)
as 22-3038
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmelo Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Christopher Rodriguez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Luis Sepulveda, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Ricardo Ricuarte
United States of America v. Velez (Juan Hernandez)
as 22-1923
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Carmelo Velez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1, Christopher Rodriguez, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Luis Sepulveda, AKA Sealed Defendant 3 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Juan Hernandez, AKA Sealed Defendant 10
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
