Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Roberts v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00721
Plaintiff:
Dietrich L. Roberts
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
DIETRICH v. ASTRUE
as 5:2012cv05681
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY J. DIETRICH
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SOLIS v. DIETRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04910
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
DIETRICH & ASSOCIATES, INC. and KURT E. DIETRICH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
James Runyon v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 12-2606
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES R. RUNYON
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL C. DANBERG, Commissioner of the Delaware Department of Corrections, PERRY PHELPS, DAVID PIERCE and others
WARE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CLARKWESTERN DIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS LLC
as 2:2012cv01047
Plaintiff:
WARE INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
CLARKWESTERN DIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Runyon v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
James R. Runyon
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PODGORNEY et al v. WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv00212
Plaintiff:
JAMES PODGORNEY and FLOYD WALTMAN
Defendant:
WORTHINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. and CLARKWESTERN DIETRICH BUILDING SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dietrich v. Susquehanna Valley Surgery Center
as 1:2011cv00925
Plaintiff:
Robert Dietrich
Defendant:
Susquehanna Valley Surgery Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WIGGINSON et al v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63698
Plaintiff:
JERRY EARL WIGGINSON and MURLENE DIETRICH JONES WIGGINSON
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION, OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HAYHURST v. EXTENDICARE, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv00185
Plaintiff:
ANDREA HAYHURST
Defendant:
EXTENDICARE, INC. and LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN SCOTT DIETRICH, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
