Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ball et al v. Nilsson et al
as 0:2023cv02013
Plaintiff:
Jeannie F. Ball, Jennifer J. Ball, Jeannie Ball and others
Defendant:
James Arthur Nilsson, Ben Frye, Erik Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edner v. Dietrich
as 0:2022cv02061
Petitioner:
Ryan C. Edner
Respondent:
Michelle Dietrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edner v. Dietrich et al
as 0:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ryan C. Edner
Defendant:
Michelle Dietrich, Cecil Naatz, Jacob Birkholz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cowen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02185
Plaintiff:
William Curtis, II, Kurt Everett Darby, Jack Duncan and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo, LLC, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Rogers v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 0:2017cv02530
Plaintiff:
Elroy Rogers
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture, Minnesota Board of Animal Health, Diane Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watso et al v. Piper et al
as 0:2017cv00562
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Watso and Kaleen Dietrich
Defendant:
Emily Piper , Scott County , Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dietrich v. National Railroad Adjustment Board of the National Mediation Board
as 0:2015cv01875
Plaintiff:
Cheri B Dietrich
Defendant:
National Railroad Adjustment Board of the National Mediation Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dietrich v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
Leslye Dietrich
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc., Merck & Co, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dietrich v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv04661
Plaintiff:
Charles W Dietrich
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
