Cases 41 - 50 of 1,360
In re: Jeffrey Clark
as 23-7075
In Re:
In re: Jeffrey B. Clark
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jeffrey B. Clark, A Member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (Bar Registration No. 455315)
Respondent / Appellee:
D.C. Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Arizona, State of et al v. Michael D Lansky LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Arizona, State of, Alabama, State of, Arkansas, State of and others
Defendant:
Michael D Lansky LLC an Arizona limited liability company doing business as Avid Telecom, Michael D Lansky individually as a Member/Manager/Chief Executive Officer of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom and Stacy S Reeves individually as a Manager/Vice President of Michael D Lansky LLC doing business as Avid Telecom
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Edward Allan Watts et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2023cv03953
Plaintiff:
Edward Allan Watts and Lindsay Lopez
Defendant:
United States of America, United States District Court for the District of Columbia, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION et al v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION and AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
HALL et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
as 1:2023cv01261
Plaintiff:
STACIA HALL, RALPH CHITTAMS, SUZZANNE KELLER and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ELECTIONS
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW and WASHINGTON LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS AND URBAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Washington, et al v. FDA, et al
as 23-35294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF OREGON, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMINISTRATION, ROBERT M. CALIFF, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF IOWA, STATE OF MONTANA and others
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2023cv01165
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW NOBLE and NO PARTY
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lana Renna, et al v. Rob Bonta, et al
as 23-55367
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LANA RAE RENNA, DANIELLE JAYMES, HANNAH SPOUSTA and others
Defendant / Appellant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California and ALLISON MENDOZA, in her official capacity as Director of Department of Justice Bureau of Firearms
Amicus Curiae:
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, THE STATES OF COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, and RHODE ISLAND, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
STALLINGS-FIELDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
BELINDA STALLINGS-FIELDS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
