Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Divine v. C.R. Bard et al
as 2:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Divine
Defendant:
C.R. Bard and Davol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Powell v. Divine Status LLC
as 2:2023cv00501
Plaintiff:
William Powell
Defendant:
Divine Status LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Epps v. USA
as 1:2016cv01578
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Divine God Epps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Favela et al v. Toledo Public Schools et al
as 3:2014cv01565
Defendant:
Toledo Public Schools , Jeff Wagner , Darrell Waggoner and others
Plaintiff:
Rolando Favela , Divine Ifeadike and Ludeovik Wanda Salang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chasteen v. Mack et al
as 3:2013cv00037
Plaintiff:
Adam Chasteen
Defendant:
Lawrence Mack, Rudolph Divins, Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knowledge v. USA
as 1:2012cv01729
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Divine Knowledge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Divins v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00033
Plaintiff:
Roderick Divins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Safadi v. Chertoff
as 1:2007cv03179
Plaintiff:
Hassan Faiz Safadi
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Peter Keisler, Robert Divine and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Williams et al v. Ohio's Secretary of State et al
as 2:2007cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jomo Williams, J.K.M.W. Committee and Government Of Divination National Committee
Defendant:
Ohio's Secretary of State and John and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
