Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Carr et al v. DJO Incorporated et al
as 3:2012cv00042
Plaintiff:
Faith Carr and Bruce H. Carr
Defendant:
DJO Incorporated , DJO Global, Inc. , John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roehll v. I-Flow, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00096
Plaintiff:
Meghan B. Roehll
Defendant:
I-Flow, LLC , DJO Incorporated and DJO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Escobedo v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01111
Plaintiff:
Michael Escobedo
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation , DJO, LLC , DJO Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pennington v. DJO, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02740
Plaintiff:
Brenda G. Pennington
Defendant:
DJO, LLC , DJO, Inc. and I-Flow Corporation
Bollman-Chavez v. I-Flow Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01634
Plaintiff:
Freda G. Bollman-Chavez
Defendant:
I-Flow Corporation , DJO, LLC and DJO Incorporated
Hunter v. DJO Incorporated et al
as 4:2010cv00155
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hunter
Defendant:
DJO Incorporated, DJO, LLC, McKinley Medical, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ohle v. DJO, Incorporated et al
as 1:2009cv02794
Defendant:
DJO, Incorporated, Djo, llc, McKinley Medical, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Katie Ohle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Van Eps v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00962
Plaintiff:
Tyler Van Eps
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Sales Corporation, DJO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury-Product Liability
Carlisle v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 2:2009cv02567
Plaintiff:
James Carlisle
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation, Stryker Corporation, I-Flow Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
