Cases 11 - 20 of 50
(PC) Ausborn v. Kern County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 1:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Randy Ausborn
Defendant:
Kern County Sheriff Dept., Kern Medical Hospital, Lt Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Z.E. v. Seaworld, LLC
as 3:2021cv01596
Plaintiff:
Z.E.
Defendant:
Seaworld, LLC
Guardian Ad Litem:
Rikki Marie Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Dobbs v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv06379
Plaintiff:
Chanez Dobbs
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Pax Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corbett et al v. PharmaCare U.S., Inc.
as 3:2021cv00137
Plaintiff:
Damaris Luciano, Montiqueno Corbett and Rob Dobbs
Defendant:
PharmaCare U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arthur et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2019cv08435
Plaintiff:
Gary Young, Jeffrey Schackart, Steven Boyd and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(SS) Dobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019cv01449
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Dobbs v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2019at00730
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Nathan Dobbs v. Subaru of America, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv01853
Defendant:
Subaru of America, Inc., a New Jersey corporation, Does 1 through 20, inclusive and Subaru of America, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nathan Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ennis v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv01126
Plaintiff:
Joseph L. Ennis
Defendant:
L. Kelly, Whitehead, M. Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
