Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Webster et al v. Opco LLC
as 4:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Rachel Webster, Skylor Dobbs and C.D.
Defendant:
Blue Box Opco LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sanabria et al v. Goldman et al
as 4:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Ramirez Sanabria and Tia Joe Colvin Sanabria
Defendant:
Scott Alan Goldman and Dobbs Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Dobbs v. Dizzy Dog Animal Rescue
as 4:2023cv03154
Plaintiff:
Carly Dobbs
Defendant:
Dizzy Dog Animal Rescue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Drywater v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Dusty A Drywater
Defendant:
FNU Dobbs, Food Services Administrator and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dressen et al v Flaherty et al
as 3:2023cv00155
Plaintiff:
Ernest Ramirez, Brianne Dressen, Shaun Barcavage and others
Defendant:
Rob Flaherty, Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Karine Jean-Pierre and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Joel Bell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phillip Ray Powell
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maida v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00097
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Maida
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cook v. Dobbs et al
as 1:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Armando Cook
Defendant:
Bryan Dobbs, J Bartlett, FNU Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Dobbs
as 1:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Lesford Mark Reid
Defendant:
Bryan K Dobbs, Unknown Bartlett, Unknown Rhodes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
