Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
Dobbs et al v. Microport Orthopedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02394
Defendant:
Microport Orthopedics, Inc., Wright Medical Group, Inc., Wright Medical Technology, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Dobbs and Theresa Dobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lozier et al v. Dobbs Consulting, LLC
as 3:2014cv01454
Plaintiff:
Brooke Lozier and Brooke Clinical Logistics, Inc.
Defendant:
Dobbs Consulting, LLC
Counter_plaintiff:
Dobbs Consulting, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Brooke Clinical Logistics, Inc. and Brooke Lozier
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Williams v. Jones et al (RHC)
as 3:2013cv00648
Plaintiff:
Antoneo Jonte Williams
Defendant:
Jimmy Jones, Knox County Sheriff Detention Facility, Wilshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2010cv00061
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Brian Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bumpas v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 3:2009mc00207
Plaintiff:
Darrell W. Bumpas
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Brian Koehn and others
Breedlove v. Easterling et al
as 1:2009cv01025
Plaintiff:
Rodney Breedlove
Defendant:
Easterling, Carroll County et al, Paul Newman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
