Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Keenan Cofield v. Corizon, Incorporated
as 15-6549
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEENAN KESTER COFIELD
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Correctional Medical Services, Incorporated, Its Director/Owners, State & Federal Medical Service Provider, CONTRACT SPECIALIST TO STATE OF MARYLAND, MAYOR MARTIN O'MALLEY, Governor, State of Maryland, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Individual and Official Capacity, GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, Administrator, U.S. MARSHALL and others
Cofield v. Corizon, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Corizon Inc. , Eric H. Holder, Jr. , General Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC et al
as 1:2013mc00042
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant:
MONEY NOW FUNDING, LLC, ROSE MARKETING, LLC, DEPAOLA MARKETING, LLC and others
US v. Hubert Downer
as 13-4387
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HUBERT DOWNER, a/k/a Doc
US v. Rodney Carter
as 13-4186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RODNEY CARTER, a/k/a Doc Roc
US v. Spencer Bowen
as 12-7195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson
US v. Spencer Bowen
as 10-7679
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson
US v. Spencer Bowens
as 09-7632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SPENCER BOWENS, a/k/a Scooter, a/k/a Clyde, a/k/a Melvin McCurdy, a/k/a Doc Johnson
US v. Phillip Kent
as 08-4376
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP DWAYNE KENT, a/k/a Doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.