Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Dees v. State of Alabama, The et al
as 2:2021cv00392
Defendant:
State of Alabama, The, A-DOC, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Jammall Dees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope v. Jones et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00288
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC, Steven T Marshall and Patrice Richie Jones
Plaintiff:
Gerald Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Turner v. State of Alabama DOC
as 7:2021cv00170
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC
Plaintiff:
Dwain Evans Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monroe v. State of Alabama DOC
as 7:2020cv01660
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC, Seargent Sealey, Colonel Woods and others
Plaintiff:
James Kelly Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duggan v. Wavley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00329
Plaintiff:
Parrish Lamar Duggan
Defendant:
Elmore, AL DOC, Lt. Wavley, Officer Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. State of Alabama DOC
as 2:2020cv00341
Defendant:
State of Alabama DOC
Plaintiff:
Eric Kevin Dansby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baisden v. Bolling (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Baisden, II
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Leon Bolling, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Price et al
as 2:2016cv01178
Plaintiff:
Davon L Ellis
Defendant:
C Price, DOC Comm, Leon Bolling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zaner v. Alabama DOC Commissioner et al
as 2:2015cv02336
Plaintiff:
Johnathon Zaner
Defendant:
Alabama DOC Commissioner, Price, Willie Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Ala. DOC Mental Health Services et al
as 5:2015cv01939
Plaintiff:
Alfred David Hardy, III
Defendant:
Ala. DOC Mental Health Services, Ala. DOC Health Services, Alabama Mental Health Services Madison County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
