Cases 1 - 10 of 59
GOHLMAN v. BOYD et al
as 1:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GOHLMAN
Defendant:
M. BOYD and DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TISDALE v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2023cv01972
Plaintiff:
NAISHA TISDALE
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MARK BROTHERS, KEVIN RANSOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGURL v. WALKER et al
as 2:2023cv01584
Plaintiff:
HAROLD J. MCGURL, JR.
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, CORRECTIONS OFFICER D. COSTELLO, CORRECTIONS OFFICER R. OHLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. PA DOC et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
PA DOC and WELLPATH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SCHIFF v. SCI SOMERSET MEDACAL DEPT. et al
as 3:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
BARRY C. SCHIFF
Defendant:
SCI SOMERSET MEDACAL DEPT., HARRIS BURG and REGANAL DOCTOR FOR DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SALEEM v. METZ et al
as 2:2023cv01128
Plaintiff:
NASIR SALEEM
Defendant:
K. METZ, SMITH, SCI GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. BALLTYNE et al
as 5:2023cv02144
Plaintiff:
BYRON MASON JONES, JR.
Defendant:
LT. BALLTYNE, C.O. BAROFSKI, LT. POLDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAKE v. ENTERO et al
as 2:2023cv00604
Plaintiff:
DAVID FRANCIS BLAKE
Defendant:
H. ENTERO, R. SOLOMAN, A. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. DOC et al
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TAYLOR
Defendant:
DOC, VETERANS MEDICAL, DR. KALE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
