Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,280
Doe #1 (JRC) et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff: John Doe #1 (JRC), John Doe #2 (TJC), John Doe #3 (RKF) and others
Defendant: William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff: Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant: The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cormia v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff: Dolwin D. Cormia
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Erik Cooper
Defendant: James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff: Erik Cooper
Defendant: Sevier County, Tennessee, Michael R. Hodges, Jr., Rhett Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hancock v. Centurion Health et al
as 3:2024cv00504
Plaintiff: Dennis Edward Hancock
Defendant: Centurion Health and Unknown John or Jane Does #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesbster v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00508
Plaintiff: Javon Webster
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollins v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00486
Plaintiff: Steve Rollins
Defendant: Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordway v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00464
Plaintiff: Korbyn Ordway
Defendant: Amber Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff: Anthony E. Perry
Defendant: Yolanda Williams, Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?