Cases 41 - 50 of 624
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55814
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Arturo Atilano, Jr. v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv07895
Plaintiff:
ARTURO ATILANO, JR.
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, OFFICER MANUEL RIOS #42557, OFFICER JONATHAN DELGADILLO #40897 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Allum v. State of Montana et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Allum
Defendant:
State of Montana, Montana State Fund and Does 1-100, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07481
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv07436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
