Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08862
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CAPITAL HITCH SERVICE INC v HILL
as 4:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL HITCH SERVICE INC
Defendant:
DEWAYNE HILL and JOHN DOES I 10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Doe I et al v. Carson City et al
as 3:2018cv00538
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe I, Joann Doe II, JoAnn Doe III and others
Defendant:
Carson City, City of and Does I-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis Abbott v. Shelly Fisher, et al
as 13-35174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS E. ABBOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SHELLY FISHER, BRENT REINKE, JOHANNA SMITH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv03068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Houst v Boston Scientific Corp et al
as ID/1:12-cv-00079
Plaintiff:
Sherry Houst and Dale Houst
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does I-`10
Houst v Boston Scientific Corp et al
as 1:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Sherry Houst and Dale Houst
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and John Does I-`10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haxton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01466
Plaintiff:
Lendell Haxton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc and Does I-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haxton v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv01532
Plaintiff:
Lendell Haxton
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Does I-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Akopian v. Bay Capital Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv02006
Plaintiff:
Veronica Akopian
Defendant:
Bay Capital Corporation, DOES I-10, Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
