Cases 31 - 40 of 512
JONES v. WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
RANDALL JONES and City of Westfield, Indiana
Defendant:
WESTFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, DAKOTA FOOTE, KAEDEN GEBHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holloway v. South Bend City of et al
as 3:2023cv00466
Plaintiff:
Courtney Holloway
Defendant:
City of South Bend, Officer Alexander Williams, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments - Sex Discrimination
FARLEY v. OWEN COUNTY INDIANA et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
LARRY FARLEY
Defendant:
DWEN COUNTY INDIANA, DON VANDERMOERELL, BILL HOBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. DWIGGINS et al
as 1:2023cv00483
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHEAL JONES
Defendant:
LEEANN DWIGGINS, MADISON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, JAKE BROOKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. GRANT et al
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL JONES
Defendant:
BRANDON GRANT, DARRON GRANGER, DUSTIN ARMSTRONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Patel v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Raj Patel and Raj K Patel
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
