Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Budestean v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2015cv00176
Plaintiff:
Vladimir Budestean
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nathan v. Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) et al
as 5:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sheldon Nathan
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime Garcia-Ontiveros v. K. Dixon, et al
as 14-11295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAIME GARCIA-ONTIVEROS
Defendant - Appellee:
K. DIXON, Warden, H. BRYAN, Associate Warden and DALBY HEALTH SERVICE DOE 1-100
Sacramento Perez v. Dalby Health Service, et al
as 14-11137
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SACRAMENTO PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DALBY HEALTH SERVICE, QUINTANA, Dalby Health Cordinator, KERRY DIXON, Warden and others
Flores v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00136
Plaintiff:
Victor Flores
Defendant:
S McAdams, L Bond and Dalby Facility Medical Staff Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andujar v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00135
Plaintiff:
Luis Aneudis Andujar
Defendant:
S McAdams, L Bond and Medical Staff Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez-Lamas v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00124
Plaintiff:
Victor Gonzalez-Lamas
Defendant:
S McAdams, L Bond and Medical Staff Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aquino-Castillo v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00115
Plaintiff:
David Aquino-Castillo
Defendant:
S McAdams, L Bond and Dalby Medical Staff Doe 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Padilla v. USA, et al
as 14-40607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE RUBEN ARGUETA PADILLA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WILLACY COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and DOE 1-100
Ramirez-Cossio v. McAdams et al
as 5:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Ramirez-Cossio
Defendant:
S McAdams, L Bond and Dalby Facility Health Staff DOE 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
