Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Jones v. Barr, et al
as 20-6189
Defendant / Appellee:
LORI MCCONNELL, individual capacity, TIMOTHY HENDERSON, individual capacity, ALLEN BROWN, individual capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERTA ROSE JOSEPHINE JONES, and those similarly situated
Camarillo et al v. Mnuchin et al
as 3:2019cv02315
Defendant:
Pioneer Credit Recovery, Inc., Dr. Ben Carson, Steven T. Mnuchin and others
Plaintiff:
Javier Camarillo and Jose Amial
Jones v. Barr et al
as 5:2019cv01056
Defendant:
Robert Ravitz, Lori McConnell, David Prater and others
Plaintiff:
Alberta Rose Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lawson v. Sopchak et al
as 4:2017mc02801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lawson, Sr
Defendant:
Larry Sopchak, B R Williams and Doe 1 Thru 100
IN RE SUBPOENA IN
as 1:2012mc00569
Petitioner:
NEAL A. ROBERTS
Respondent:
PACKARD PACKARD & JOHNSON and DOES 1 THRU 100
Movant:
DONALD WILLIAMSON
Adderly v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv61475
Plaintiff:
Todd Adderly
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., MERSCORP, INC., Deutsche Bank National Trust Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01339
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
UNITED STATES v. WEST PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM, INC., ET AL
as 2:2007cv05120
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
WEST PHILADELPHIA COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM, INC., JOHN F. WHITE, JR. and DOES 1 THRU 100
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
