Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sims v. Egan et al
as 1:2022cv06614
Plaintiff:
Mario L. Sims
Defendant:
Shannon O'Connell Egan, Nathan Blaske, Dinsmore & Shohl LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Stitt v. City of Decatur et al
as 2:2022cv02138
Plaintiff:
Quartus Stitt
Defendant:
City of Decatur, Decatur Police Department and Officer Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Regional Home Health Care, Inc. v. Azar, II et al
as 1:2019cv03760
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, ALEX M AZAR, II, NCI Information Systems, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Regional Home Health Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stoller v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00140
Plaintiff:
Christopher Stoller
Defendant:
Marco Flores, Lisa T. Damico, Richard Galanti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown, Sharon v. Polk County, Wisconsin et al
as 3:2018cv00391
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lynn Brown
Defendant:
Polk County, Wisconsin, Steven Hilleshiem, Janet Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARLOW v. CITY OF MITCHELL et al
as 4:2014cv00083
Defendant:
DANNY BAKER, CITY OF MITCHELL, DOES 1 TO 10 and others
Plaintiff:
MARILYN BARLOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Duensing v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA et al
as 2:2011cv00387
Plaintiff:
Beth M Duensing
Defendant:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA , Kliment P Mitreski and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rector v. Discover Bank NA et al
as 2:2011cv00329
Plaintiff:
Joy M Rector
Defendant:
Discover Bank NA , Ian M Septoski and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
