Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL v. FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY et al
as 5:2018cv00267
Defendant:
WILBUR GENE BRYANT, FORT VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY, BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA and others
Plaintiff:
NYA HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DATA SOFTWARE SERVICES LLC v. DOE 1-5
as 7:2017cv00034
Plaintiff:
DATA SOFTWARE SERVICES LLC
Defendant:
DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
THORP et al v. SINGLETON et al
as 1:2016cv00059
Plaintiff:
WILBERT ANDREW THORP, JR and GLORIA THORP
Defendant:
ARTIS SINGLETON, JOHN DOE 1-5 and RICHARD ROE 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Jarmarsh Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00067
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Jarmarsh Inc and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Rivertown Investments, LLC, et al.
as 4:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
Rivertown Investments LLC and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Gardan East Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Gardan East
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs
Joe Hand Promotions Inc v. Gardan South Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions Inc
Defendant:
John Does 1-5 and Gardan South
Cause Of Action: Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radio Telegraphs
Malcolm v. John Does 1-5
as 7:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Patrick A Malcolm
Defendant:
John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Havert v. Meyer
as 1:2010cv00074
Plaintiff:
Chandra Havert
Defendant:
Sandra Meyer and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
