Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv10722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wernikoff v. Graham-Smith et al
as 1:2012cv12054
Plaintiff:
Brenda Wernikoff
Defendant:
Loletha Graham-Smith , Margaretta Collins, Vanessa Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv11960
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Mohiuddin v. Raytheon Company
as 1:2012cv11747
Plaintiff:
Ahsan Mohiuddin
Defendant:
Raytheon Company and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Sneade et al v. Gemme et al
as 4:2011cv40061
Defendant:
Gary J. Gemme, Mark Rojas, City of Worcester and others
Plaintiff:
Dana Sneade , Sharde Russell and Elijah Williamson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Speranza v. Adesa, Inc.
as 4:2011cv40014
Defendant:
Adesa, Inc. and Does 1-5
Plaintiff:
Janice G Marsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carpenter v. Rivera et al
as 4:2010cv40233
Plaintiff:
Ron Carpenter
Defendant:
Samuel Rivera , Robert Johnson , Michael Mulvey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perry v. Hodgson et al
as 1:2010cv10769
Plaintiff:
Ricco Perry
Defendant:
Hodgson, George A. Vose, Jr., James Lancaster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roggio et al v. Gardner, City of et al
as 4:2010cv40076
Plaintiff:
Vincent Victor Roggio and Callie Lasch Roggio
Defendant:
Gardner, City of, William J Grasmuck, Edward Basener and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Freiman et al v. Margosian et al
as 1:2010cv10484
Plaintiff:
Peyton Yates Freiman and Charles Edward Lincoln, III
Defendant:
Ara H. Margosian, P.C., II, Pino D'Orazio, H.R. McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
