Cases 61 - 70 of 494
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. CDC, et al
as 21-35653
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
CDC, COVID 19, Crimes, HENRICO, VA Sheriff and others
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. USDOE, et al
as 21-35650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, Directors, JOSEPH R. BIDEN, DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Xiu Sun, et al v. Donald Trump
as 21-5174
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Xiu Jian Sun, The Spiritual Adam
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald J. Trump, Former President of U.S.A., Mr.
Roy Day v. Donald Trump, et al
as 21-12614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP and GEORGE ERVIN PERDUE, III
Raj Patel v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-5155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Raj K. Patel
Defendant / Appellee:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, Veronica Syretia Root Martinez, University of Notre Dame Du Lac and others
Bates v. Trump
as 21-1533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeremy Bates, derivatively on behalf of the United States of America
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America and Donald J. Trump, in his personal capacity
Adesijuola Ogunjobi v. United Nations
as 21-1694
Defendant / Appellee:
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, UNITED NATIONS and WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Plaintiff:
DALLAS COWBOYS, NATIONAL BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION, 5 WORLD MARKETS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADESIJUOLA OGUNJOBI
Jones et al v. Trump
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Frederick K. Jones and Kathryn Reiter
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Louis Holger Eklund v. United States of America, Inc., et al
as 21-35442
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, D. SPROUL, Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND, AKA Louis Holger
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
