Cases 31 - 40 of 156
ZELAZO v. CHERTOFF et al
as 5:2008cv01183
Plaintiff:
MALGORZATA ZELAZO
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Thomas v. Hogan et al
as 1:2008cv00417
Petitioner:
Omar Thomas
Respondent:
Thomas Hogan and Donald Monica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
AUGUSTINE v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv01098
Petitioner:
BIJUMON K. AUGUSTINE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SHEN et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01014
Plaintiff:
QING SHEN, WEN FENG SUN and ZI XUAN SHEN
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, EVELYN UPCHURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00347
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Kavtaradze v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00547
Plaintiff:
David Kavtaradze
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Donald Monica and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Virani et al v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2008cv00548
Plaintiff:
Raheel M. Virani and Nisha Mithani
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Donald Monica and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
VASO v. CHERTOFF et al
as 3:2008cv00273
Plaintiff:
Bledar Vaso
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Julie Myers, Thomas Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
