Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Joyner (Ellison)
as 25-1579
Defendant:
STARLIN NUNEZ, TYRELL SUMPTER, ANTHONY ELLISON and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Joyner (Nunez)
as 25-48
Defendant:
DAVID VALERIO, Sealed Defendant 7, Sealed Defendant 2 and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Murray v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv01230
Plaintiff:
Donnell Murray
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Johnson (Green)
as 21-2244
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Latique Johnson, Ines Sanchez, AKA Meth, Donnell Murray, AKA Don P and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Green, AKA Light, AKA Moneywell
United States of America v. Johnson (Green)
as 21-1923
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Latique Johnson, Ines Sanchez, AKA Meth, Donnell Murray, AKA Don P and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Green, AKA Light, AKA Moneywell
United States of America v. Johnson (Green)
as 21-1896
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Latique Johnson, Ines Sanchez, AKA Meth, Donnell Murray, AKA Don P and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Brandon Green, AKA Light, AKA Moneywell
United States of America v. Johnson (Cherry)
as 21-1459
Defendant:
Michael Evans, AKA Puff, Donnell Murray, AKA Don P, Eric Grayson, AKA Gistol and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
David Cherry, AKA Showtime
United States of America v. Johnson (Murray)
as 19-3952
Defendant:
David Cherry, AKA Showtime, Michael Evans, AKA Puff, Eric Grayson, AKA Gistol and others
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Donnell Murray, AKA Don P.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01012
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
