Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Donnelly v. FCA US, LLC
as 4:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M Donnelly
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Jones v. Matthews et al
as 2:2020cv00258
Defendant:
Lake County Sheriff's Office, P.O. Donnelly, Cpl. Matthews and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00107
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
CARLIN PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC v. R.R. DONNELLY & SONS, INC.
as 4:2016cv00032
Plaintiff:
CARLIN PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC
Defendant:
R.R. DONNELLY & SONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
DONNELLY v. TIPTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2015cv01136
Defendant:
SCOTT E. BRIDGE, DAVID CAMPBELL, STEVE COX and others
Plaintiff:
HEATHER MARY CHRISTINE DONNELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PETTIS v. R.R. DONNELLY & SONS
as 1:2014cv01707
Defendant:
SARA KAGAY, R.R. DONNELLY & SONS and RICHARD SCHNADIG
Plaintiff:
BERNARD J. PETTIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MILLER v. BUCSHON et al
as 3:2014cv00130
Defendant:
REPRESENTATIVE LARRY BUCSHON, TOM CIBROWSKI, US SENATOR DAN COATS and others
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruse v. VanVleet et al
as 4:2014cv00052
Plaintiff:
Doris A Cruse
Defendant:
Thomas VanVleet , David Kessler , Newton County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DONNELLY v. PURDY et al
as 1:2012cv01484
Plaintiff:
JUDI DONNELLY
Defendant:
DUNDEE CENTRAL SCHOOL, FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS INCORPORATED, BONNY PERCY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
