Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Ruby Hicks v. Doris Scott, et al
as 23-3440
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUBY HICKS, as Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Quandavier K. Hicks
Defendant / Appellant:
DORIS A. SCOTT, individually and in her official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, JUSTIN T. MOORE, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, BENJAMIN M. SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Ruby Hicks v. Doris Scott, et al
as 23-3383
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RUBY HICKS, as Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Quandavier K. Hicks
Defendant / Appellant:
DORIS A. SCOTT, individually and in her official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, JUSTIN T. MOORE, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, BENJAMIN M. SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Ruby Hicks v. Doris Scott, et al
as 19-3410
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CINCINNATI, OH, DORIS A. SCOTT, individually and in her official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio, BENJAMIN M. SCHNEIDER, individually and in his official capacity as employee of the City of Cincinnati, Ohio and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUBY HICKS, as Administrator of the Estate on behalf of Quandavier K. Hicks
Hicks v. Scott et al
as 1:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Ruby Hicks
Defendant:
Doris A Scott , Justin T Moore , Benjamin M. Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
