Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bennett v. Illinois State Trooper et al
as 1:2024cv06865
Defendant:
M. Volkmen and Illinois State Trooper
Plaintiff:
Douglas Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BENNETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51974
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS BENNETT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frederick Douglas Bennett Sr v. San Bernardino Cnty et al
as 5:2016cv00222
Defendant:
Access Securepak, Aramac Canteen Corp, Aramac Canteen Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
17:
Doe
Frederick Douglas Bennett Sr v. Carey Davis et al
as 5:2016cv00132
Defendant:
Alverez, Alverez, City of San Bernardino of San Bernardino Cnty and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
SBPD:
San Bernardino County Police Dept
Frederick Douglas Bennett v. California Via Calif Dept of Corrections & Rehab et al
as 5:2012cv02277
Defendant:
Armak/Aramak Canteen Co, Armak/Aramak Canteen Co, Arrowhead Regional Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
Peters v. Hagedorn et al
as 2:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Peters
Defendant:
Timothy Austin Hagedorn, Gregory Neil, Debbie Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Frederick Douglas Bennett Sr v. California Dept of Corrections et al
as 5:2012cv01322
Defendant:
Beaucaire, California Dept of Corrections, Carmicheal and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr
Kubala et al v. Parker et al
as 2:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Susan Kubala
Defendant:
Travis Parker, Trent Parker, Michael Zerhusen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Frederick Douglas Bennett et al v. Victorville Child Protective Services et al
as 5:2011cv00602
Plaintiff:
Frederick Douglas Bennett, Sr.
Defendant:
Does, Victorville Child Protective Services and Victorville City
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-6466
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
