Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Page v. Douglas Dretke, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2003cv02741
Petitioner:
Lawrence Gene Page
Respondent:
Douglas Dretke, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sims v. Dretke
as 3:2003cv01618
Petitioner:
Gary Eugene Sims
Respondent:
Douglas Dretke, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coleman v. Dretke, et al
as 4:2002cv03865
Petitioner:
Christopher Coleman
Respondent:
Douglas Dretke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Don Cooper v. Gary Johnson, et al
as 09-40223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON WAYNE COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY JOHNSON, DOUGLAS DRETKE, RICHARD TRINCI and others
Phillips v. Wilbur et al
as 2:2008cv00225
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Kemph L Wilbur, Isaac R Arzola, Douglas Dretke and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bernal v. Quarterman, et al
as 08-20695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFREDO BERNAL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, MADELINE ORTIZ, CHARLES WILLIAMSON, Senior Warden and others
Jones v. Shabazz, et al
as 08-20697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL LEE JONES, JR., also known as Samuel Hakeem Muhammad
Defendant - Appellee:
AKBAR SHABAZZ, Director of Islamic Chaplains, CHARLES KISER, Prison Chaplain, BILL PIERCE, Director of Chaplaincy Department and others
Brewster v. Dretke
as 08-40685
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL BREWSTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS DRETKE
Allen v. Dretke
as 1:2008cv00288
Petitioner:
Henry Allen
Respondent:
Douglas Dretke
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tuft v. State of Texas, et al
as 08-20168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT A TUFT
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, BRENDA CHANEY, former Warden of Jester 3 Unit, KATHREN GONZALES, Assist. Warden of the Jester 3 Unit and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
