Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Fogle v. Stouffer et al
as 8:2015cv00355
Petitioner:
Anthony Fogle
Respondent:
J Michael Stouffer and Douglas Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03734
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brent v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Brent
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Yolanda Tanner, Douglas Gansler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cofield et al v. Federal Communications Commission et al
as 1:2014cv02051
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield, Michael Allen and John Wesley Johnson
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, Maryland Parole Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lemon v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
Arron Frederick Lemon
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Douglas Gansler, David Brust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEMON v. O'MALLEY et al
as 1:2014cv00848
Plaintiff:
ARRON FREDERICK LEMON
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY, DOUGLAS GANSLER, DAVID BRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Gansler
as 1:2014cv01296
Petitioner:
Matt Gerald Green
Respondent:
Douglas Gansler and Stephen V'ilio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thompson v. Goins-Johnson et al
as 1:2014cv01268
Petitioner:
Danny Eugene Thompson
Respondent:
Patricia Goins-Johnson and Douglas Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COFIELD et al v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION et al
as 1:2014cv00522
Plaintiff:
KEENAN K. COFIELD, MICHAEL ALLEN and JOHN WESLEY JOHNSON
Defendant:
TOM WHEELER , STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND PAROLE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Erline v. Bishop et al
as 8:2014cv00594
Plaintiff:
Guy Erline
Defendant:
Frank Bishop, William Bohrer, R. Roderick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
