Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Meyers v. Anderson et al
as 7:2026cv00008
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden D. Anderson, A. Duncan, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Whitt et al
as 7:2025cv00865
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Robert Whitt, Wallens Ridge State Prison Security Staff, Wallens Ridge State Prison Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Day v. Brookshire et al
as 7:2024cv00557
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire, Carl Manis and others
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Warden Artrip
as 24-6559
Defendant:
COUNSELOR CHURCH, COUNSELOR ADAMS, INVESTIGATOR HARRIS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Day v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Lantz Domoench Day
Defendant:
Nurse Practitioner Jessee Holbrook, Dr. McDuffie, Ms. Brookshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newkirk v. Artrip et al
as 7:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Warden Artrip, Investigator Harris, Assistant Warden Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byington v. McDuffie
as 7:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Byington
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. Harold Clarke
as 24-6056
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director Department of Corrections, LISA HERNANDEZ, WARDEN RICK WHITE and others
Newkirk v. Clarke, et al
as 7:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Director, Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Hernandez, Harold Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. McDuffy
as 7:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Dr. McDuffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
