Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Blevins
as 26-6757
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS, NURSE CRYSTAL GILLEY, "Pill Call Nurse", LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Christopher Bethea v. Dr. Mullins
as 26-6486
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BETHEA
Defendant:
DR. MULLINS, Institutional Doctor
Creel v. Holbrook et al
as 7:2026cv00258
Plaintiff:
John Creel
Defendant:
Ms. Holbrook and Dr. Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annarelli v. Dotson, et al.
as 1:2026cv00054
Plaintiff:
David J. Annarelli
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Dr. Mullins, Unknown Doctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randy Lassiter, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Blevins
as 25-6464
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE LASSITER, JR.
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BLEVINS, NURSE CRYSTAL GILLEY, "Pill Call Nurse", LIEUTENANT COLEMAN and others
Karsten Allen v. Lieutenant Smith
as 25-6000
Defendant:
DR. MULLINS, Doctor at Wallens Ridge State Prison, LIEUTENANT SMITH, Lieutenant at Wallens Ridge State Prison, UNIT MANAGER STALLARD, Unit Manager at Wallens Ridge State Prison and others
Plaintiff:
KARSTEN OBED ALLEN
Cooper v. Mullins et al
as 7:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Dr Mullins, Muckduff, C/O Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Mullins et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Muckduff, CO Johnson, Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Newkirk v. K. Fleming
as 24-6063
Plaintiff:
KENNETH H. NEWKIRK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT K. M. FLEMING, HAROLD C. CLARKE, Director, Dept. of Corrections, CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Dept. of Corrections and others
Newkirk v. Fleming et al
as 7:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Newkirk
Defendant:
Lt. KM Fleming, Harold Clarke, Chadwick Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
