Cases 1 - 10 of 12
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. DREW
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
DANIELLE M DREW
Interested Party:
GREAT SKATES ENTERTAINMENT INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RESORT CONDOMINIUMS INTERNATIONAL LLC v. BETHEL COMMODORE CORP et al
as 2:2023cv00403
Defendant:
MISSY RASOR, KERRY RASOR, KATHY RASOR and others
Plaintiff:
RESORT CONDOMINIUMS INTERNATIONAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
CROSSON v. HATIN
as 2:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY D CROSSON
Defendant:
MICHAEL DREW HATIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LARKIN v. AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
SETH LARKIN
Defendant:
AROOSTOOK COUNTY JAIL, SGT JAY, SGT TOMPKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00170
Defendant:
TRAVIS ANDREWS, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRAYMAN v. PORTER et al
as 1:2020cv00169
Defendant:
CAPTAIN SEAN MAGUIRE, CAPTAIN GARY CRAFTS, MAJOR RAYMOND PORTER and others
Plaintiff:
WADE DREW BRAYMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PLOURDE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv00532
Defendant:
MAINE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, KNOX COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN PLOURDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ABBOTT v. BURNHEIMER
as 1:2012cv00037
Petitioner:
DREW G ABBOTT
Defendant:
SCOTT BURNHEIMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DREW v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 1:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
JOANNE MARIE DREW
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
