Cases 1 - 10 of 73
Davison v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gabriel Davison
Defendant:
Clifford J Smith, Scott Rowland, Robert L Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Drummond
as 4:2024cv00222
Petitioner:
Thomas Allen Moore
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Brewer
as 24-5046
Petitioner:
RENEL BREWER
Respondent:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, Attorney General of Oklahoma
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terry, et al v. Drummond, et al
as 24-6046
Plaintiff:
SINCERE TERRY, MIA HOGSETT, TYREKE BAKER and others
Defendant:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, in his official capacity as Oklahoma Attorney General and VICKI ZEMP BEHENNA, in her official capacity as the Oklahoma County District Attorney
Yukich et al v. Gentner Drummond et al
as 6:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Philip Yukich, III, Janel Renee Stewart and Janel Renee Stewart-Yukich
Defendant:
Attorney General of Oklahoma, Kenny Rogers, Robert Fagnant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant:
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harmon v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Clark Harmon
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma, Gentner Drummond and Nowata County, Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Winston Ray Walters
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
