Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Vitrano v. Durham
as 1:2017cv01873
Petitioner:
Thomas P. Vitrano
Respondent:
D. Durham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Supreme Cable Technology, Inc. v. InLand Technologies Holdings, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00457
Plaintiff:
Supreme Cable Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
InLand Technologies Holdings, LLC , Durham Commercial Capital Corporation and Rick Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Pawloski v. Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01402
Plaintiff:
Evan Pawloski
Defendant:
Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. , Michael D. Durham and Mark H. McKinnies
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Barnwell v. Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01243
Plaintiff:
Karen Barnwell
Defendant:
Advanced Emissions Solutions, Inc. , Michael D. Durham , Mark H. McKinnies and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Green v. Schimek et al
as 1:2010cv02874
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Green
Defendant:
Peter Schimek, Jeffery Rezak, Jeffrey Byrne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International Three Crown Petroleum LLC et al v. Petromed Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv00317
Plaintiff:
International Three Crown Petroleum LLC, International Three Crown Petroleum LLC, Israel Petroleum Company and others
Defendant:
Petromed Corporation, Hagai Amir, Lyle Durham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Durham v. Lappin et al
as 1:2008cv02165
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Durham
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Harrell Watts, Michael K. Nalley and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
