Cases 1 - 10 of 591
Antonetti v. Neven et al
as 2:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Joseph Antonetti
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gary Rosales v. Q. Byrne, et al
as 23-15081
Petitioner / Appellant:
GARY CRAIG ROSALES
Respondent / Appellee:
Q. BYRNE, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Anthony Posey v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 23-15044
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MERITT POSEY
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JEREMY BEAN and others
Gladys Perez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 22-15279
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLADYS PEREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, FLORENCE MCCLURE WOMEN'S CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Manuel Melendez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-17135
Petitioner / Appellant:
MANUEL MELENDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Brandyn Gayler v. State of Nevada, et al
as 21-17028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDYN WILLIAM GAYLER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, B. SANDOVAL, JAMES DZURENDA and others
Joseph Antonetti v. E. McDaniels, et al
as 21-16687
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH ANTONETTI
Defendant / Appellee:
E. K. MCDANIELS, R. BAKER, BYRNES, AKA Byrne and others
Evier Paez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 21-16621
Petitioner / Appellant:
EVIER DIAZ PAEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Lopez et al v. The State of Nevada ex rel. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv01161
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEVADA ex rel. NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Rosemary McCrary, Brigido Bayawa and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Lopez and Colleen Lackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Sena v. Daniels et al
as 2:2021cv01154
Defendant:
Francisco Sanchez, E Cordovez, Michael Minev and others
Plaintiff:
Terrie L. Sena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
