Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Horizon Bank SSB v. Patrick et al
as 1:2023cv00691
Plaintiff:
Horizon Bank SSB
Defendant:
Dan Patrick, Dade Phelan, Glenn Hegar, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, in his official and indivial capacities, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
MacTruong v. Abbott
as 22-51024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dmt MacTruong, also known as Mac Dr. Truong
Defendant / Appellee:
Greg Abbott, Governor, Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Dade Phelan, Representative and others
MacTruong v. Abbott et al
as 1:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Dmt MacTruong, Mac Dr. Truong, Planned Parenthood Federation of America and others
Defendant:
Brad Pitt, Greg Abbott, Dan Patrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott Bedke, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4157
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
SCOTT BEDKE, in his official capacity as Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, CHUCK WINDER, in his official capacity as President Pro Tempore of the Idaho Senate and SIXTY-SIXTH IDAHO LEGISLATURE
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, JAMES FREDERICK and others
Amicus Curiae:
TEXANS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT and DADE PHELAN, Texas Speaker of the House
N.A. Building Trades Unions v. OSHA
as 21-4152
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, SMALL BUSINESS MAJORITY, TEXANS FOR RESPONSIBLE GOVERNMENT and others
The Denver Newspaper Guild, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4100
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402 and In re: MCP NO. 165, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
DENVER NEWSPAPER GUILD, COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 37074, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
Southern Baptist Theological, et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4033
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY and ASBURY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DOUGLAS L. PARKER, in his official capacity as Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health and MARTIN J. WALSH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Labor
Amicus Curiae:
CHARLES N. JEFFRESS, NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS ASSOCIATION, CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER and others
League of United Latin American Citizens et al v. Abbott et al
as 3:2021cv00259
Plaintiff:
League of United Latin American Citizens, Southwest Voter Registration Education Project, Mi Familia Vota and others
Defendant:
Greg Abbott
Consolidated Defendant:
Jose A. Esparza, State of Texas, Texas Speaker Dade Phelan and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Damon James Wilson, Roy Charles Brooks, Akilah Bacy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2021cv00943
Plaintiff:
Richard Damon James Wilson and Damon James Wilson
Defendant:
State of Texas, Governor of Texas Greg Abbott, Texas Speaker Dade Phelan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2021cv00690
Plaintiff:
Senfronia Thompson, Trey Martinez Fischer, Gene Wu and others
Defendant:
Gregory Wayne Abbott, Dade Phelan and James White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
