Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Dahl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Keli Dahl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Dahl et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
as 1:2021cv05933
Plaintiff:
Bryan Dahl, Maureen Young, Karen Needham and others
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Estate of Henry Saint Dahl v. Pajares, Pena y Oria, S.L.
as 1:2020cv02334
Plaintiff:
Estate of Henry Saint Dahl
Defendant:
Pajares, Pena y Oria, S.L., Pajares y Asociados Abogados S.L., Oria Pajares y Asociados and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Roman Oria Fernandez de Munian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Jackson v. Annucci et al
as 7:2020cv02008
Defendant:
R. Rossi, William Rivera, D. Deegan and others
Plaintiff:
Lavogia Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrelson v. TCF Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv03183
Defendant:
William F. Bieber, Vance K. Opperman, Peter Bell and others
Plaintiff:
James Harrelson
Selman v. Collins et al
as 9:2017cv01144
Plaintiff:
Elijah Selman
Defendant:
M. Collins, K. Bullock and Dahl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dahl v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00978
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Dahl
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dahl v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv00302
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dahl
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dahl et al v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2010cv07426
Plaintiff:
Janet Dahl and Richard Dahl
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Roche Laboratories, Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme (I.A.) Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
