Cases 1 - 10 of 17
PECK v. BOLOGNONE et al
as 2:2023cv03213
Plaintiff:
SEAN PECK
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT MEGAN BOLOGNONE, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KRISTA DAHL-CAMPBELL and CHIEF INSPECTOR MICHAEL COCHRANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAHL et al v. PROTECTIVE WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv01543
Plaintiff:
SUSAN F. DAHL and ARIA C. SHELLINGTON
Defendant:
PROTECTIVE WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, INC. and WEST COAST LIFE INSURANCE CO.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAHL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv05513
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SEAN DAHL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DAHL v. COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
as 2:2018cv02666
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN DAHL
Defendant:
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENSON et al v. BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
JAMIE JENSON , AMBER JACKSON , MAGEN ALLEN and others
Defendant:
BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAHL v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2017cv04190
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN DAHL
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOUDY v. DAHL et al
as 2:2017cv02071
Plaintiff:
KARIN GOUDY
Defendant:
JENS DAHL and FROZEN FOOD EXPRESS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAHL v. GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04252
Plaintiff:
OWEN DAHL
Defendant:
GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC , GLADSTONE ASSOCIATES, LLC , DANIEL KREUTER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. DAHL
as 2:2015cv03528
Plaintiff:
GLADSTONE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
OWEN DAHL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FORTUNE et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. et al
as 2:2013cv05879
Plaintiff:
RONALD FORTUNE , MICHAEL HALL , MARY CLAYBORN and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC. and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
