Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Dailey et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
as 1:2024cv01724
Plaintiff:
Austin Dailey and Kayla Dailey
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Builder Services Group, Inc. v. Riley et al
as 1:2023cv04530
Plaintiff:
Builder Services Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Steven Franklin Riley, Tracie Riley, Steven Christian Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dailey v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Dailey
Defendant:
Walmart Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
DAILEY v. CORRECT X PHARMACY et al
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
CORRECT X PHARMACY, Nurse GREY, Nurse JACKSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAILEY v. FLEMING et al
as 4:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
Mr FLEMING, Lieutenant JAMES, JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAILEY v. TOBY
as 1:2021cv00113
Petitioner:
Earnest Dailey, Jr and Earnest E. Dailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Annettia Toby
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DAILEY v. TOBY
as 5:2021cv00246
Petitioner:
EARNEST DAILEY, JR
Respondent:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dailey v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03062
Plaintiff:
Charles Dailey
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harrell v. Brickhouse et al
as 1:2018cv01183
Plaintiff:
Chyvonne E. Harrell
Defendant:
William Brickhouse, Ph.D., MHM Correctional Services, Inc., Nekeya Dumas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAILEY v. HATCHER et al
as 4:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
JAMES MONROE DAILEY
Defendant:
SHAY HATCHER, HERRON, CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
