Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Dailey v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Dailey
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dailey v. Thomas et al
as 1:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Anthony Raye Dailey
Defendant:
Albert Thomas, III, FNU Boyd, FNU Asay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dailey et al v. AmGUARD Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Douglas D Dailey and Gina Dailey
Defendant:
AmGUARD Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dailey v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Subscribing to Policy Number V605436
as 4:2021cv01957
Plaintiff:
DR. LAVERNE NATALIE CARROLL DAILEY
Defendant:
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS SUBSCRIBING TO CERTIFICATE NO. V605436 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Subscribing to Policy Number V605436
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. GGH- The Fitness Group, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv01555
Defendant:
GGH- The Fitness Group, LLC, GGH- The Fitness Group, LLC doing business as Fitness Project and T. Bryan Murphy
Plaintiff:
Sara Dailey and Melissa Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mletzko v. Dailey et al
as 3:2020cv00205
Defendant:
GEICO County Mutual Insurance Company, Advance Auto Parts, Inc. and Stephanie Brooke Dailey
Plaintiff:
Luz Ofelia Mletzko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FILING ERROR
as 3:2020cv00204
Plaintiff:
Luz Ofelia Mletzk0
Defendant:
Stephanie Brooke Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kelley v. City of Cedar Park et al
as 1:2020cv00481
Defendant:
City of Cedar Park, Sean Mannix and Christopher Dailey
Plaintiff:
Gregory Raymond Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dailey v. Saul
as 5:2019cv01429
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Carolina Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
