Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Edwin Ryan, Jr. et al v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District
as 5:2019cv01490
Plaintiff:
Keith Stroup, Rick Parpan, Leslie Kast and others
Defendant:
Chino Valley Independent Fire District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ali Awad v. Ronesha Webb et al
as 2:2017cv08675
Plaintiff:
Ali Awad
Defendant:
Ronesha Webb and Dale Williams
Cedric Dale Williams v. The People of the State of California
as 2:2016cv06830
Respondent:
The People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Cedric Dale Williams
Dale William Lochmiller v. Daniel Paramo et al
as 5:2015cv00061
Petitioner:
Dale William Lochmiller
Respondent:
Daniel Paramo and The Attorney General of The State of California Kamila Harris
Patrick Bliss et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv07648
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bliss, Olly Cantell, Danielle Carter and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does, Johnson and Johnson Services Inc and others
Mariana Escobar et al v. Mason Dale Williams et al
as 2:2010cv09273
Plaintiff:
Danny Chacon and Mariana Escobar
Defendant:
Julie Williams, Mason Dale Williams and Williams Family Trust
Paul E Marshall v. Supreme Court of State of Missisippi et al
as 2:2010cv07802
Defendant:
Hardy Wilson Memorial Hosp, Medcamp Inc, Lemar Pickard and others
Plaintiff:
Paul E Marshall
Dale William McKinley v.Gina Lynn Kershaw et al
as 5:2008cv00575
Plaintiff:
Dale William McKinley
Defendant:
Gina Lynn Kershaw, Jane Templeton, Kristen Van Dyke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Dale William McKinley, III v. Gina Lynn Kershaw et al
as 5:2007cv01392
Plaintiff:
Dale William McKinley, III
Defendant:
Gina Lynn Kershaw, Shilo Rieser and Kristen Van Dyke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
